Reverse Proxy / Web Server

Caddy vs Nginx

Caddy and Nginx both serve sites and reverse-proxy your self-hosted apps. Caddy gets you automatic HTTPS with a two-line config. Nginx is faster at very high load, more configurable, and has decades of guides behind it. For most homelabs, Caddy's automatic certificates win on time saved, but the right pick depends on what you are putting it in front of.

Updated 2026-06-01 · by

Side by side

CaddyNginx
Automatic HTTPSBuilt-in (Let's Encrypt)Manual (certbot)
Config syntaxShort CaddyfileMore verbose nginx.conf
HTTP/3On by defaultSupported, manual
Performance at scaleVery goodFaster at extreme load
Config reloadGracefulGraceful
Guides / answersSmaller, growingLargest, decades deep
MemorySlightly higherLean
ModulesCaddy modulesNginx modules (compiled or dynamic)

Automatic HTTPS is the headline

Caddy gets a TLS certificate from Let's Encrypt automatically the first time it serves a hostname, and it renews on its own. You write a hostname and a reverse-proxy target, and HTTPS just happens. For a homelab where you are putting a dozen apps behind clean URLs, that removes the single most annoying recurring chore.

Nginx does not do this on its own. You pair it with certbot to obtain and renew certificates, which works well and is thoroughly documented, but it is another moving part to set up and keep healthy. If your reason for running a reverse proxy is mostly to get HTTPS in front of your apps, Caddy is doing that job for you out of the box.

Config: short and modern vs deep and proven

A Caddyfile to proxy an app is a few lines, and HTTP/3 is on by default. The syntax is readable and hard to get badly wrong. That simplicity is exactly what you want for a homelab full of small services.

Nginx config is more verbose, but that verbosity buys precision. Twenty years of Stack Overflow answers and production configs mean almost any routing, caching, or rewrite scenario already has a documented solution you can copy. If you need fine-grained control or an unusual setup, that depth is worth a lot.

Performance and where each fits

At homelab scale, both are far faster than your workload needs, so performance is not the deciding factor for most people. At the extreme high end, serving very high request rates, Nginx still edges ahead and uses less memory, which is why it remains a default in front of large production sites.

For a self-hoster, the honest framing is this: Caddy saves you time on the common case, and Nginx is the tool to grow into if you hit a specific need it serves better. Many people run Caddy as the main reverse proxy and only reach for Nginx when a particular app or performance requirement calls for it.

What a real Caddy config looks like

The reason people fall for Caddy is how little config it takes. Proxying an app behind HTTPS is three lines: the hostname, the reverse_proxy directive, and the address of the app. Caddy fetches and renews the certificate, redirects HTTP to HTTPS, and turns on HTTP/3, all without you asking. Add a second app and it is three more lines.

The equivalent in Nginx is a server block plus a separate certbot setup to get and renew the certificate, plus the HTTP-to-HTTPS redirect written by hand. None of it is hard, and there are a thousand examples to copy, but it is more moving parts to keep healthy. For a lab full of small services, those parts add up.

If you run everything in Docker, also look at Traefik, which discovers containers by their labels and configures routes automatically. The rough split: Traefik for dynamic container environments, Caddy for a simple static config you can read at a glance, and Nginx when you need its depth or raw performance.

Where Caddy wins

  • Automatic HTTPS with no certbot. Certificates issue and renew themselves.
  • Short, readable Caddyfile. Putting TLS in front of an app is a few lines.
  • HTTP/3 is on by default.

Where Nginx wins

  • Faster under heavy traffic and very lean on memory.
  • The largest pool of existing configs, guides, and Stack Overflow answers.
  • Fine-grained config for unusual routing and tuning.

Which to pick, by situation

Your situationPickWhy
Putting HTTPS in front of self-hosted appsCaddyAutomatic certificates and a short config remove the busywork.
Serving very high trafficNginxFaster at extreme load and leaner on memory.
Unusual routing, caching, or rewritesNginxDecades of documented configs cover almost any case.
You want the least config to maintainCaddyFewer moving parts, no separate certbot to babysit.

The verdict

For a homelab where you are reverse-proxying a handful of apps and want HTTPS handled for you, Caddy saves real time. The Caddyfile is short and certificates renew themselves. Choose Nginx if you serve very high traffic, you need a specific module or fine tuning, or you want the deepest pool of existing configs to copy. For most self-hosters Caddy is the faster path, and Nginx is the one to grow into if you hit its limits.

Choose Caddy if you want automatic HTTPS and a simple config for proxying your apps.

Choose Nginx if you serve heavy traffic, need specific modules or fine tuning, or want the largest pool of existing configs.

Official links

FAQ

Does Caddy really handle HTTPS with no setup?

Yes. The first time Caddy serves a public hostname, it requests a Let's Encrypt certificate and renews it automatically. You need a valid domain pointing at the server and ports 80 and 443 reachable for the challenge.

Is Nginx faster than Caddy?

At extreme request rates, yes, and it uses less memory. At homelab scale both are far faster than you need, so for most self-hosters speed is not the deciding factor.

Can I use Caddy with Docker?

Yes, and it is a common pairing. Caddy sits in front of your containers as the reverse proxy, terminating TLS and routing by hostname. Its short config makes adding a new app a one or two line change.

What about Traefik?

Traefik is a third popular option, especially with Docker, because it auto-discovers containers via labels. Caddy is simpler to reason about with a static config, while Traefik shines in dynamic container environments. All three do automatic HTTPS.

Is Caddy good for production?

Yes. Caddy runs in production on plenty of sites and handles real traffic well. Nginx still edges it at extreme request rates and uses less memory, so very high-traffic sites often stay on Nginx, but for most apps and homelabs Caddy is production-ready.

Is Nginx still relevant?

Yes. Nginx remains one of the most deployed web servers and reverse proxies, with unmatched documentation and performance at scale. Caddy wins on automatic HTTPS and simplicity, but Nginx is far from obsolete.

Related on HomelabCompass

← All comparisons